Resources for OAH session, April 11, 2014, “Using Technology to Make Teaching More Fun and Effective.”
How I use it: Platform for publishing student projects across courses (Digital Worcester, active from 2008-2012)
Why I like it: Part of broader DH community, scaleable and robust. Timing was right. Promise of permanence and continuity over time.
Problems/Considerations: Hard to pull off as solitary venture â€“ really needs funding, continuity, advisory board, partners/ team. Not intuitive for students, so I did all the data entry.
Why I like it: Open-source and authentic. A real-world skill, not a closed garden. Open web; transparency, archiving. I own it: have a lot of control over its look and features. Allows for student work to have long-term web presence.
Problems/Considerations: There is a student learning curve, hard to extract assessment data. I own it: any problems/glitches are mine to solve. Puts me at odds with our adopted campus solutions.
Google Docs / Google Maps
How I use it: Student collaboration in real time, low-stakes & short term. Some examples: a class exam study guide, mapping a book, crowdsourcing a class question, primary source “newspapers” during a class workshop session, using a Google doc template.
Why I like it: Especially good for messy, quick one-time uses.
Problems/Considerations: None, really â€“ its ease of use and disposability is a plus feature
Wikis (via Wikispaces)
How I use it: Student project management, â€œauxiliaryâ€ site for special, long-term course projects (a group-authored novel in a first-year seminar, a simulation of Congress in a 200-level elective), I’ve also used it as a resource file while consulting with K12 teachers in a TAH project
Why I like it: Permanent archive. Easy to see who modifies. Teaches wiki format basics (though not Wikipedia coding syntax), very low learning curve on both front end and back end
Problems/Considerations: Not especially customizable; canâ€™t order the pages/subpages
Digital Archives / Open Educational Resources (OER)
How I use it: Online repositories, commercial and scholarly, access to materials for analysis
Why I like it: Suits my aversion to closed/paid publishers’ primary source collections. Bonus: So many good ones!
Problems/Considerations: Logic needs explanation. Too easy? Vast universe, overwhelming. Creates personal archive silos
In our discussion, the question came up about how you find good ones. There’s no one meta-aggregator, of course, but some ideas included MERLOT, the Digital Public Library of America, Teaching w/ the Library of Congress, and Beyond the Bubble from SHEG. I have a list of some favorites I made a few years ago, but it’s far from comprehensive.
Digital Text Analysis Tools
Why I like it: Allows instantaneous searching across MASSIVE amounts of information; permits new questions
Problems/Considerations: Can seem gimmicky; Not sure how to interpret findings
How I use it: More workshop opportunities in the methods course, usually during our unit on personal papers, letters & diaries. Some examples include University of Iowa’s DIY History, the New York Public Library’s Menus project, and the Newberry Library’s Civil War Letters.
Why I like it: Teaches close reading, handwriting deciphering, integrity of sources, authentic contribution â€“ sense of participating in something larger
Problems/Considerations: They run their course; individual contribution is small, fleeting; possibility of low student engagement
Why I like it: Accessible, familiar gateway to larger concepts of reliability, the iterative nature of history, information literacy. Raises awareness of who contributes (few women, e.g.)
Problems/Considerations: I only do it with my FYS. Should probably extend this into every class in some way, make it more explicitly history-focused. The stigma of Wikipedia, seen as lowbrow, irresponsible.
How I use it: Student podcasts, possibly radio serial play in my first year seminars
Why I like it: Alternative to papers & visually-oriented which is the default now (Ppt, esp). Uses another sense; attunes to sound in/as history. Requires revision, extended time, hard to slap together at the last minute
Problems/Considerations: Student learning curve. Everyone hates the sound of their own voice. Can be a challenge to find copyright-free audio. Web not set up for sound searching.
Two tools I haven’t yet use, but think they’re worth mentioning as possibilities for using technology
Annotation Studio (MIT HyperStudio) – online, collaborative markup for close reading. Seems like it will be great way to get students to slow down and READ, in digital environments, with possibilities for collaboration and sharing on a larger scale (across different sections, across different campuses). BUT – Beta version, not yet really available in all platforms. Still in development.
Clickers – our campus IT doesn’t support them, but I know instructors elsewhere who use them, to pose low-stakes quick questions. Quick assessment for just-in-time teaching and peer instruction, helpful in large classes, student engagement, low-stakes/anonymous. Only for face to face teaching; campus-wide adoption issues? Can be glitchy. See here for an example of clickers in peer writing review (Derek Bruff/ProfHacker); The pedagogy can work even w/o the actual clickers (Heather M. Whitney/ProfHacker)
Want more? DH Tools for Beginners – gorgeous.
Also: Bamboo DiRT
DIY Professional Development: ProfHacker